50-State Coverage › Alaska

Alaska traffic control documentation requirements

What Alaska DOT asks a contractor to record about temporary traffic control, where that requirement comes from, and how strong the evidence behind it is.

Primary source

Alaska DOT — primary source

Source confidence

High

What Alaska requires

Documented requirement

Alaska DOT&PF construction forms include 25D-104 Traffic Control Daily Review and 25D-103 Traffic Control Signs/Devices Report (Daily).

Source: Alaska DOT — primary source

How solid is this? Alaska is documented from a high-confidence agency source, linked above, but we have not yet verified contract-binding specification language the way we have for the states in the full analysis. What governs your job is your contract and its special provisions — check them. This page is a stub until that verification is done, and it is deliberately excluded from search results so it cannot pass itself off as more than it is.

On federal-aid work, 23 CFR 630 Subparts J and K apply whatever Alaska specifies, with a compliance date of December 31, 2026 — the federal floor, explained. And after an incident the questions come from the incident, not the specification: 105 published judicial matters on that.

DTCD produces this record from the drive-through itself, and names the controlling Alaska requirement on the generated PDF. Open a sample before deciding anything.

Try it on one Alaska project See pricing

Filing a work-zone request in Alaska?

Draw the closure on a map and the builder reads the route, mileposts and county from Alaska’s own public GIS, checks bridge clearance on the route and the detour, and exports a WZDx feature, a PDF or an email. It runs in the browser — nothing is submitted or stored.

Open the Alaska builder → · open the offline build · all 50 states

What changes at the Alaska state line

Crews rarely work one state, and the record a neighbouring DOT expects is often named differently and cited somewhere else entirely. Here is how the states bordering Alaska compare:

State	Citation	Evidence we have
Washington	Section 2-04.3(1)B (Traffic Control Supervisor)	Contract-binding spec language
Oregon	Section 00220 (Accommodations for Public Traffic) — TCS duties	Contract-binding spec language
Idaho	Not yet verified	Agency source, high confidence
Montana	Not yet verified	Agency source, high confidence

All 50 states → · The full 50-state analysis, with every citation →