Montana traffic control documentation requirements
What Montana DOT asks a contractor to record about temporary traffic control, where that requirement comes from, and how strong the evidence behind it is.
What Montana requires
MDT guidance says: “A daily project diary shall be kept detailing the project traffic control activities…” and provides temporary traffic-control device quality/inspection expectations.
Source: Montana DOT — primary sourceOn federal-aid work, 23 CFR 630 Subparts J and K apply whatever Montana specifies, with a compliance date of December 31, 2026 — the federal floor, explained. And after an incident the questions come from the incident, not the specification: 105 published judicial matters on that.
DTCD produces this record from the drive-through itself, and names the controlling Montana requirement on the generated PDF. Open a sample before deciding anything.
Try it on one Montana project See pricing
Draw the closure on a map and the builder reads the route, mileposts and county from Montana’s own public GIS, checks bridge clearance on the route and the detour, and exports a WZDx feature, a PDF or an email. It runs in the browser — nothing is submitted or stored.
Open the Montana builder → · open the offline build · all 50 statesWhat changes at the Montana state line
Crews rarely work one state, and the record a neighbouring DOT expects is often named differently and cited somewhere else entirely. Here is how the states bordering Montana compare:
| State | Citation | Evidence we have |
|---|---|---|
| Idaho | Not yet verified | Agency source, high confidence |
| North Dakota | Not yet verified | Agency source, high confidence |
| South Dakota | Not yet verified | Agency source, medium confidence |
| Wyoming | Section 703.4.2 (Documentation) | Contract-binding spec language |
All 50 states → · The full 50-state analysis, with every citation →